The oldest regulatory body in the state, the North Carolina Utilities Commission has long set rates and ensured a steady supply of electricity and gas for customers - usually by permitting new power plants from which Duke could profit.īut in the last decade, the worsening climate crisis and the success of renewable energy has begun scrambling the traditional electric utility model and with it the traditional role of regulators.Ī 2007 state law requiring a certain amount of renewable energy - combined with tax credits and a federal requirement that monopoly utilities buy from small power producers - sparked a wave of solar farms across the state that have had to be connected to Duke’s grid.Īs appliances and buildings have grown more efficient, electricity demand has flattened, raising questions about whether new power plants are needed. Sign up for free to get the latest delivered straight to your inbox.Īn old regulatory panel learns new tricks Get connectedĮvery morning, thousands of energy professionals turn to our newsletters for the day’s most important news. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, the panel could steer Duke Energy and other utilities in its purview in a new direction.īut while key orders are expected this year on electric vehicles, rate hikes, and other issues, advocates say many of the commission’s most consequential decisions on the state’s energy future will come in 2021.Īnd while this crop of regulators may be more inclined than their predecessors to push Duke toward more renewables and less coal and gas, looming energy policy questions will still have to be resolved by the General Assembly - not regulators. Now filled almost entirely with appointees from Gov. The North Carolina Utilities Commission is at full strength at last, having spent almost half of 2019 with four commissioners instead of seven. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANYĪppeal and Error § 9- appeal from Utilities Commission order - subsequent order while appeal pending - appeal mootĭefendant’s appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming an order of the Utilities Commission in a general rate making case issued on 30 April 1974 is moot where Southern Bell filed a new application for another rate increase while this case was on appeal to the Court of Appeals, and the Commission’s order in that case filed on 19 December 1976 rendered all questions raised in this appeal academic.The regulatory body is expected to rule on key orders this year related to electric vehicles, rate hikes and other issues.Įditor’s note: This story has been updated to include a comment from Duke Energy. Justice Lake did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.Īppeal of right under General Statute 7A-30(3) by Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company (hereinafter Southern Bell) from decision of the Court of Appeals, 24 N.C. 2d 543 (1975) affirming an order of the North Carolina Utilities Commission (hereinafter Commission) in a general rate-making case. *287Southern Bell filed with the Commission on June 30, 1973, an application seeking approval of an increase in rates for intrastate service in North Carolina in the amount of $33,812,129. On July 30, 1973, the Commission suspended the effective date of the requested increase until further order of the Commission, declared the case to be a general rate case, and set the matter for hearing. After interventions (including that of the North Carolina Attorney General on behalf of the using and consuming public) the case was heard by the Commission in November and December, 1973. On April 30, 1974, the Commission issued its Final Order (hereinafter Order) authorizing Southern Bell to increase its annual rates and charges by $8,271,000, effective May 15, 1974. Beverly Lake, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, and Robert P.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |